Before we start today, I simply must pass on a joke I just read, an oldie but goodie. One summer day a Polack comes running into a store in a panic. “Quick, give me a coat hanger! I just locked my wife and kids in the car!”
The Woodpile Report this morning was one of the better ones, as Ol Remus describes the insatiable appetite of a welfare city. Of course, most of us mutter in a politically incorrect manner about Blacks taking over a city and running it into the ground, shortly followed by a tirade against Blacks in Africa taking over a country and running it into the ground, perhaps followed by some tirade against certain races ill-founded in logic. Because Detroit or Africa has nothing to do with race. Blacks are no more lazy or thrifty than Whites. You could look at certain areas in the South or elsewhere and find perpetual welfare and decay. It is just on a much smaller scale than Detroit. Detroit, Black welfare and all the rest is just an outward manifestation of a culture of tribalism. In any centralized grouping such as a nation-state or an Industrial city, Blacks do not conform to our social mores. And that is to be applauded, to an extent. Blacks, again generalizing, never went beyond the tribe in organization. Why, I have no idea as I’ve studied almost nothing of Africa. And it is easy to see that Blacks never assimilated into American society ( which might explain why we reserve such animosity towards each other and not for other races ).
Blacks stayed tribal as most other groups went the way of the nation. For a time that worked against them as the rest of the world used centralization to their advantage. But in the very near future, when the collapse decentralizes everything, only Blacks as a large group will have the social make-up needed to adapt to that ( we can all eventually conform back to the historical norm. It will just take us longer ). If you look at tribalism, you see why most of Africa and all of Detroit is such a craphole. Not because the leaders are Black but because the leaders are part of a tribe who merely happen to be Black. But the Irish did the exact same thing in Boston and elsewhere, so it isn’t about race. It is about structure. The Irish were just more successful because their tribalism was tempered by assimilating AFTER they pilfered. Blacks refuse to assimilate and are working on a level divorced from our economy. In short, their tribal leaders steal from all other tribes, regardless of race, to enrich their tribe exclusively. They don’t work within our accepted parameters of theft. They steal with the blessing of institutions, but also steal individually, and even steal without future consideration. But that doesn’t make them stupid or greedy, it just makes them less prone to temperament in their behavior. All the Whites thievery will implode the system in the end, we just stretched it out farther is all.
Men, by large, act badly by combat. Women, mostly, act badly by more subtle means such as trickery and other slights of hand. In the end, both are stealing. Men steal by right of conquest on the battlefield, women by winning the contest of deceit and outsmarting their rivals. One uses brawn, the other brain, but both in the end are just stealing what isn’t theirs. But we dress it up, so we are okay with it. Men glamorize violence, and institutionalize it, and love it. To their minds, the winner in combat deserves the spoils by displaying superior skill and courage. Women win by far more nuanced maneuvering, moving up the social hierarchy by conquering the males with the most power and possessions. It isn’t just dumb buxomly blondes that prevail. You can see how far and no farther beauty gets most women. The most prized, other than the occasional wallflower, combine boobs and brains and other attributes males can only guess at. Male fantasy movies of Sara Connor combat with poodle shooters oversimplify, as females are far more deadly without weapons than with. But you boil it all down, subtract the “provide and protect” and the “attract and nourish”, and you find most humans succeed or fail by nothing more than theft. The best thief is the sexiest, most sought after specimen because therein is security for the family and tribe.
Promiscuous females are vilified by other females as cheating to win the race to steal males ( not that they win in the end, being rejected by women and merely used by men- but never having the pick of men ). Theft is a survival trait, relished by all, but it can’t be without style and thought. The craftiest, most subtle female wins- not the skank. The warrior who shows the noblest virtues in combat is thought highest of, not the little weasel that stabs an opponent in the back. The athlete who wins ( sports being a combat substitute ) by hard work, no matter the level of natural ability, is always better off than the cheater on steroids. We don’t mind thieves, but we do demand they conform to an accepted norm. We hate armed robbers, because they should be staying home collecting welfare checks. Both are theft, but one is accepted because it shows mental ability ( cheating the system ) while the other shows a brain dead idiot. The brain is our evolutionary weapon. We don’t take its misuse lightly. Intelligence is required in any endeavor of theft. Which might be why the Detroit thieves are frowned on. They showed no class, no style, no thought. They just grabbed viciously like a silly child. If they had been smart enough to take just enough to not kill the Golden Goose, then they would have been like all other American cities ( which, ironically, won’t last much longer than Detroit. But the difference is, the quality of life until the end will be better ) and no one would care the mayor was Black.
All of my links and information: http://jamesmdakin.blogspot.com/2013/05/info-page.html