Tuesday, August 6, 2013

sexy thief


SEXY THIEF

Before we start today, I simply must pass on a joke I just read, an oldie but goodie.   One summer day a Polack comes running into a store in a panic.  “Quick, give me a coat hanger!  I just locked my wife and kids in the car!”

*

The Woodpile Report this morning was one of the better ones, as Ol Remus describes the insatiable appetite of a welfare city.  Of course, most of us mutter in a politically incorrect manner about Blacks taking over a city and running it into the ground, shortly followed by a tirade against Blacks in Africa taking over a country and running it into the ground, perhaps followed by some tirade against certain races ill-founded in logic.  Because Detroit or Africa has nothing to do with race.  Blacks are no more lazy or thrifty than Whites.  You could look at certain areas in the South or elsewhere and find perpetual welfare and decay.  It is just on a much smaller scale than Detroit.  Detroit, Black welfare and all the rest is just an outward manifestation of a culture of tribalism.  In any centralized grouping such as a nation-state or an Industrial city, Blacks do not conform to our social mores.  And that is to be applauded, to an extent.  Blacks, again generalizing, never went beyond the tribe in organization.  Why, I have no idea as I’ve studied almost nothing of Africa.  And it is easy to see that Blacks never assimilated into American society ( which might explain why we reserve such animosity towards each other and not for other races ).

*

Blacks stayed tribal as most other groups went the way of the nation.  For a time that worked against them as the rest of the world used centralization to their advantage.  But in the very near future, when the collapse decentralizes everything, only Blacks as a large group will have the social make-up needed to adapt to that ( we can all eventually conform back to the historical norm.  It will just take us longer ).  If you look at tribalism, you see why most of Africa and all of Detroit is such a craphole.  Not because the leaders are Black but because the leaders are part of a tribe who merely happen to be Black.  But the Irish did the exact same thing in Boston and elsewhere, so it isn’t about race.  It is about structure.  The Irish were just more successful because their tribalism was tempered by assimilating AFTER they pilfered.  Blacks refuse to assimilate and are working on a level divorced from our economy.  In short, their tribal leaders steal from all other tribes, regardless of race, to enrich their tribe exclusively.  They don’t work within our accepted parameters of theft.  They steal with the blessing of institutions, but also steal individually, and even steal without future consideration.  But that doesn’t make them stupid or greedy, it just makes them less prone to temperament in their behavior.  All the Whites thievery will implode the system in the end, we just stretched it out farther is all.

*

Men, by large, act badly by combat.  Women, mostly, act badly by more subtle means such as trickery and other slights of hand.  In the end, both are stealing.  Men steal by right of conquest on the battlefield, women by winning the contest of deceit and outsmarting their rivals.  One uses brawn, the other brain, but both in the end are just stealing what isn’t theirs.  But we dress it up, so we are okay with it.  Men glamorize violence, and institutionalize it, and love it.  To their minds, the winner in combat deserves the spoils by displaying superior skill and courage.  Women win by far more nuanced maneuvering, moving up the social hierarchy by conquering the males with the most power and possessions.  It isn’t just dumb buxomly blondes that prevail. You can see how far and no farther beauty gets most women.  The most prized, other than the occasional wallflower, combine boobs and brains and other attributes males can only guess at.  Male fantasy movies of Sara Connor combat with poodle shooters oversimplify, as females are far more deadly without weapons than with.  But you boil it all down, subtract the “provide and protect” and the “attract and nourish”, and you find most humans succeed or fail by nothing more than theft.  The best thief is the sexiest, most sought after specimen because therein is security for the family and tribe. 

*

Promiscuous females are vilified by other females as cheating to win the race to steal males ( not that they win in the end, being rejected by women and merely used by men- but never having the pick of men ).  Theft is a survival trait, relished by all, but it can’t be without style and thought.  The craftiest, most subtle female wins- not the skank.  The warrior who shows the noblest virtues in combat is thought highest of, not the little weasel that stabs an opponent in the back.  The athlete who wins ( sports being a combat substitute ) by hard work, no matter the level of natural ability, is always better off than the cheater on steroids.  We don’t mind thieves, but we do demand they conform to an accepted norm.  We hate armed robbers, because they should be staying home collecting welfare checks.  Both are theft, but one is accepted because it shows mental ability ( cheating the system ) while the other shows a brain dead idiot.  The brain is our evolutionary weapon.  We don’t take its misuse lightly.  Intelligence is required in any endeavor of theft.  Which might be why the Detroit thieves are frowned on.  They showed no class, no style, no thought.  They just grabbed viciously like a silly child.  If they had been smart enough to take just enough to not kill the Golden Goose, then they would have been like all other American cities ( which, ironically, won’t last much longer than Detroit.  But the difference is, the quality of life until the end will be better ) and no one would care the mayor was Black.

END

 

16 comments:

  1. Current Statistics, especially crime related ones, do not support your racial equality or more to the point "tendency" theories. However I will make a concession that ingrained culture plays an important roll here as well and that indeed Whites in general have been evolving into a less industrially oriented culture overall.

    One can see a direct correlation between a seasonally based culture and the female competition you mentioned. Monogamy, gender relations and Women policing their own as a cultural norm dies out the further one moves into tropical conditions. Always has and that has effected values both culturally and racially over time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmmm. I'm looking forward to climate based studies on culture, not an area I'm overly familiar with. But off hand, isn't Latino culture somewhat uniform, from the Rio Grande all the way down? Would tropical location then be irrelivant? As far as race crime, of course there is an element of "whitey deserves this for slavery". But that is cultural-vigilanteism/vendetta. Not necessarily race, right? I love talking at you, PP. You keep me on my toes with rational arguments.

      Delete
    2. I am certainly not as familiar with Central American groups as European or African but I would say you have different factors at work. Foremost would be much less landmass overall making it easier for a specific group to dominate and less room for transition at the edges. If I remember right some of the rain forest tribes practiced communal type marriage/child rearing much like what was seen in African tribes though.

      Also, unlike the rest of the world Central America didn't have the constant pressure and conquest originating from Northern "Barbarians" as much.

      The close confinement and other needs that go along with actual Winters instilled a much more noticeable racial trait of future time orientation and social stigmas in areas like relationships. These traits are found more in White Europeans and Northern Asians and are especially noted in older female control of the younger female activities.

      In truth it may not be popular but racial traits are there and extend to other areas besides future time orientation and relationships. They can be as seemingly irrelevant as the ability to digest milk, however in your post the more relevant trait is in fact the future time orientation. It isn't democrat/Liberal values that caused Detroit it is in fact the combination of Liberal values and the lack of future time orientation that exists in the Black community and you can see the same patterns repeated in all other majority Black Democrat strongholds like Camden, Philadelphia and Birmingham.

      Admitting that there are racial differences is no different than admitting that there are gender differences or even tribal differences inside a racial group. Like Irish drinking or Scots stealing cattle or Germans being orderly.

      Delete
    3. I can't help but become fixated on the "racial trait" of northern climes. I grant you the cultural trait. But racial? If both whites from northern Europe and northern Asian tribes experiance the same climate, both races have the same orientation. So, how can it be racial? Am I interpeting this wrong? Also, I see your point in the last paragraph. To me, the important thing is to avoid judgemental differances in race. If there are all that many compared to cultural. I think in the end, all of us are a little scared of talking about racial differances. But if its facsinating to study, I say lets go for it! Piss off a liberal or two.

      Delete
    4. It becomes racial after enough time has imprinted it into the DNA. The milk example and the ability to digest it is a good indicator of a group that needed to harvest and maximize for climate and season changes. However the ability to digest lactose also manifested itself in places where it was just easy to keep cattle. So these traits can be picked up due to environment. Just because say Northern Europeans picked up traits that facilitated organization and planning doesn't mean the Inuits couldn't and/or didn't do it as well but there is more than likely subtle differences in the trait and other environmental reasons the traits spread in some area and remained localized in others.

      Also what is a racial trait for some can be learned to a point by others. Call the trait a natural ability in some and a simple learning process with others.

      I would even postulate that to a point African-Americans were at one time on the road to learning a sense of future time orientation and to this day have more cultural experience with it than other Africans but not quite up to European standards. Or to put it more bluntly civilization building is a talent Caucasians take to better than Africans.

      Delete
    5. Okay. Thank you! You've explained it very well and I see your very good point. Sorry it took so much effort on your part for me to click with it. I can be slow sometimes.

      Delete
  2. Ok just to be clear Theft is NOT the only way to gain, hardwork and labour and inspiration can also earn one the goods and services that gain the acclaim and success everyone desires.
    Think about it the IRS is theft, yet no one is happy saying they are an IRS agent.
    The best theives do their best to become instead of parasites, symbyots. Helping the hosts out in a manner more efficent and reducing the costs of the theft. This is likely how our immune systems evolved, how our governments evolved as well. And the reason the ancestral american government was so much more successfull than say the mexican or brazillian one. And why the US government is failing- sure peak resources pays a part but the excessive overhead that built up during the times of plenty is what is killing our nation now. Europe has similar issues, but is more symbyoticly arranged to begin with so is going to suffer less decline once they do away with the bulk of the EU overhead...

    -Grey

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, sure, you are describing smart theft. Rewarding intelligence. As long as we have a chance to work towards a better position-less theft-we don't mind. Gotta give the carrot and the stick.

      Delete
    2. But mates are choosen based on success, and the IRS is successful theft, oddly though they suffer a paucity of mates and people willing to deal with them socially. Farmers and Ranchers on the other hand, when proven successful, tend to get well to do and have plenty of willing mates and community. Farmers and Ranchers seldom need to abuse/steal from others, even the plants and animals are given a good life.
      -Grey

      Delete
    3. Look at the history of western ranchers. They used to kill other ranchers over fences, water and types of grazers. Today, they petition for free public lands resources. Still theft, but institutionalized.

      Delete
  3. Some good insights, Lord Bison.

    In my personal experience, Blacks have been an easy group to pick on (historically and today). There are a ton of stereotypes and a lot of bad experiences that a typical white boy can have with Blacks (these days more than ever).

    With all humans not like me (non-white, non-male, non-straight, rich, poor, non-American, etc), I've found that there is no purely predictable pattern. There are too many exceptions that I've encountered that make racism, sexism, homophobia, classism, and a few other -isms illogical.

    Of course, because I dont throw the baby out with the bathwater and keep an open mind, I'm branded a liberal or worse. Whatever. You never know who is gonna come through and have your back when you need a hand.

    Detroit's problems have nothing to do with color and everything to do with 40+ years of deficit spending, fiscal mis-management, Big Labor Union greed, and voter ignorance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Every group needs a scapegoat. With Blacks, beware having too much white in you ( although Obammy gets a pass ) is a bad thing.

      Delete
  4. Lord Bison of the Great Basin and King of Coiffure;

    I couldn't agree more on it isn't race that's the problem, it's what the races bring or don't bring to the table that is the problem at hand, namely the bankrupting of the very system that established the cities in the first place. In other words, cultural values or the lack thereof is what kills the 'golden goose' of the story. No more, no less shiftless than anyone else is very apt indeed! It does take a 'sexy thief' to bring home the bacon, but it takes pure moxie to keep the bacon once its home, lest another 'sexy thief' takes what you've stolen first. Keep keeping it real James!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Usually that other sexy thief is the wife or family member. Inside job, institutionally sanctioned. All your hard honest work undone by another theft. Honor amongst theives?

      Delete
  5. I remember writing a guest article for you over at Bison where I said I had no problems whatsoever with sneaking up on someone and shooting them in the back and taking their stuff. You got so many comments saying they wanted to form a posse and hunt me down! If a collapse ever does get around to happening I will live quite well off the salvaged gear of those who played fair.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I remember. Loved it. Bushwaking is THE way to go. After the die-off, then you can get around to establishing civilry, etc.

      Delete