Tuesday, November 27, 2012

dust bowl propaganda

DUST BOWL PROPAGANDA
Once again, Dr. Gary North puts out valuable and well researched information:
Now, I of course never pass over an opportunity  to point out the asshattery and evilness of our government, nor do I miss any opportunity to highlight FDR as the king of all asshats of all time, a minion of Lucifer whose twisted foul soul was as crippled as his polio addled legs ( and, one presumes, his shrunken useless manhood ).  I would as soon pull up a chair with Lincoln and buy him a beer ( and we all know how much I hate THAT monkey testicle gargling commie puke Yankee twat ) than to piss on the head of FDR if his hair was on fire.  So I applaud the good Doctor for giving historical background on FDR and the propaganda with the Dust Bowl.  But we shouldn’t stop there.  We need to ask why FDR was such a bastard, why the central bank was behind him and what it all means for us today.  It’s all very well and good to point out Rooosevelt was a godless commie, a disciple of Lenin,  an enemy of the Constitution, the one who did the most to use the suffering of the poor to strong arm in the longest and most effective burst of collectivization in this country.  Why?  Not just because he was a commie.  Doing his best to turn this county red might have been evident, but why was it necessary?  Not just because the bankers told him to ( although they most certainly did ).  Why did the banks push for centralization when we were still so resource rich?
*
Collectivization is usually reserved for when resources become scarce and centralization is the only way to allocate those resources while still holding on to power.  Of course the process also happens when others grab power, but usually not in a free society with plenty of food and energy.  Surplus usually means political freedom, so why the need to go commie just at the time we started going from low power wood and coal to the bonanza of high energy oil?  I would stipulate the strong possibility that this was largely out of our control ( even though the original instigator ended up benefiting ).  WWI had many causes, but one was Germany positioning for super power status.   Since she had very few resources of her own, and was thwarted by Great Britain and France from acquiring colonies for resource exploitation, war was pretty much inevitable.   Our central bank tried to make a tidy profit from the conflict, then had to “sacrifice” a third of a million American lives to bail out the threatened loan payers when the Russian revolution emptied out the eastern front and Germany had a chance to win ( of course, I believe we got involved before that but even then the Allies needed help.  If they lost, our bankers lost their loans ).  And of course even that was too simple of a reason.  Even back then, the first stirrings of the global war for oil control was felt.
*
When Germany lost the war, our bankers were not saved.  On the contrary, the German inflation threatened the global financial system ( the allies were not getting the money from Germany they needed to pay back the American banks.  The whole system was in danger ).  Then every country got desperate and as a way to gain a temporary advantage started tariff wars.  Which  shut down global trade which meant far too many economies which were industrialized didn’t have the means to trade goods for food.  The Depression was global not because resources were scarce but because resources could not be traded ( every region had a surplus of A and a deficit of B.  With trade, nobody wanted for anything.  Without trade, everyone had shortages ).  So what was a banker to do?  Beggar the local population.  The banker bailouts of five years ago are not a new thing.  Eighty years ago the bank turned on the citizens trying to extract enough blood to survive and thrive.  This was why the campaign from the government to drive small farmers into the city.  Killing the family farm was not a 1970’s creation.  It was tried previously during the 30’s Midwest drought.  The bankers needed everyone in debt and working as wage slaves even back then.  Yes, the propaganda ended at the start of WWII.  The war effort needed lots of extra food ( soldiers and factory laborers and farmers all needed double to triple calories to function at peak- and there certainly was a correlation between the US being the only well fed combatant and our victory ) and there was no time to mechanize collective farms.  You worked with what you had on hand, and besides the factories needed to churn out war material.   The war was much more profitable to the bank than indebted consumers would have been ( which is why we never went back to peace even up to today ).
*
I’m not trying to say that the bankers will get us involved in another world war.  That is impossible with our extreme debt and our resource deficit.  What I am saying is that the government going collectivist is nothing new.  The government as servants to the central bank is nothing new.  And most importantly, the government as a prostitute to the banks and doing injury to its citizens to enrich the bankers is certainly nothing new.  And doesn’t it follow that if four generations ago the government was willing to kill millions of its own and put the rest into bondage, that it will be quite willing to do far worse the next time around ( which looks to be about right now )?  Of course it does.  Know your enemy to protect against him.
END
NEW Bison Blog CD For Sale
I've got an actual professional to achieve and format all the old blog on a CD-ROM.   It turned out really nice- much nicer to read than online. It does cost $10 plus shipping, figure another $4 or so, which might be a bit on the higher side.  But I think I'm worth it.  My cut will be about $5.  That isn't too much to ask for over five years of work and nearly two million words of pure brilliance.  Here is the link to order:
http://kunaki.com/sales.asp?PID=PX00KX7Z1I
*
Please support Bison by buying through the Amazon graphics above and to the right of each article.  You can purchase anything, not just the linked item.  Enter Amazon through my item link and then go to whatever other item you desire.  As long as you don’t leave Amazon until after the order is placed, I get credit for your purchase.  Thank you.
*
Amazon "Frugal Survivalist" for those who can’t access the graphic links.
*
Improvised Munitions Book,  ( NOW FREE!!! Free, I tells ya! )
*
My books available at
*
By the by, all my writing is copyrighted.  For the obtuse out there.

9 comments:

  1. You can bet your perfect head of hair on WW3. Does anybody think the bankers (khazars) will just fade away?

    I like your ideas on frugal survival and your sense of humor. AND your great hair. (here it comes) Why don't you write about surviving a nuclear war? What will happen when Russia and China decide to spank America's ass? Sooner or later it's going happen. How do you plan on surviving WW3 ?

    JJ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JJ, Jim will survive in the bunker of doom. And all most loyal minions are invited...provided we each bring two bosomly wenches as homage to the fair haired one. Jim, I have 2 ex-wives you can have. LOL

      I don't forsee a large scale nuclear exchange. Maybe an EMP or one or two cities obliterated. Nuclear survival wont be the problem. The panic and collapse will be. China would not risk ruining what is left of America's farmland.

      Delete
  2. Extremely important information about what happened "last time" (in the 30's) : the camouflaged mass starving of US citizens.

    http://rt.com/news/prime-time/where-did-americas-missing-millions-go-holodomor-lessons/

    Absolute must-read.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Get over it, the North beat your puny asses and Lincoln was the best president ever. FDR was the second best president. What type of President does the South produce? George W. Bush.

    The North won and Lincoln is great, deal with it. That makes Southerners losers. haha.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bush was a blue blood east coaster Yankee hump who hid down South as a carpetbagger. And most other Southern presidents were hand chosen yes men to the Yankees, traitors to their own. Lincoln was a mule member masticating bastard. I have pictures!

      Delete
  4. I hope Lincoln at least gave your granddaddies all reach arounds while he pounded you good ole boys down south. I bet your grandaddies put on aprons and tucked their tails between their legs after Lincoln whomped all over them. They probably crapped their pants every time they heard Lincoln's name because they were scared and Lincoln loosened up their rectums.

    LINCOLN IS THE BEST PRESIDENT EVER AND THAT IS WHY THE NORTH WON THE CIVIL WAR.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Fascism doesn't mean best, it means ruthless, which is why Lincoln is considered by you to be the best of the American Presidents. Truly Best would be none other than Thomas Jefferson of Virginia, who actually mentored a young James Madison who then wrote the Bill of Rights. Those two are a much better example of Great American Statesmanship than the scourge of the South. However John Wilkes Booth can rot in the ninth circle of hell forever more, for his role in Assassinating the victorious leader. Because had the 16th American President lived instead of being killed at the hands of a true pretty boy asshat, then the racial problems that plague the United States today, would have been avoided, since he (Lincoln) would have sent the newly emancipated slaves back to their respective point of origin a true repatriation as opposed to the sorry version granted by Lyndon Baines Johnson in 1965, ala the so-called 'Great Society' which continues to this day as so-called 'white guilt.' Too Bad so sad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner and slave raper. He was definitely not one of our best presidents. Jefferson helped bring the slaves here by buying them and, thus, helped create the problem.

      Delete
    2. This is why you are proud to be Yankee, due to your judging persons of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries by the same standard of the present day with no thought whatsoever about a bigger picture. Please remember the ONLY way that agriculture could be productive at all beyond subsistence level, was to capitalize on energy available. Since the discovery of petroleum was still thirty-three years away from the date of the Great American President's passing, the only game in town which was successful was the use of chattel property. OBTW: because you're so proud to be Yankee and a provincial one at that, you are obviously ignorant of the Commonwealth of Virginia's chattel property laws on the books since the importation of said property since 1705. For example the owner of chattel property was completely responsible for not only the maintenance and well-being of said property but legally and morally responsible for said properties conduct, with heavy fines and imprisonment for those unwilling or unable to the task. Additionally your provincial attitude betrays your ignorance of the basic history of chattel property in the United States. Please remember that Jefferson like any other chattel property owner in the country had to domestically produce and trade in said property due to the fact that importation of said property into the United States was made illegal under United States law in 1808. But never mind the facts, we are about opinion here and obviously you feel that, by your comments that everything is okay now that Lincoln in your opinion was the greatest American President, while those of us who are obviously Libertarians express the same for Jefferson.

      Delete